Martín Shanly

This comedy of errors revolves around a hapless 30-year-old named Arturo. His penchant for indiscretions is as impossible to overlook as the finesse with which the film glides from March 2020 to the preceding decade and back again.

This comedy of errors revolves around a hapless 30-year-old named Arturo. His penchant for indiscretions is as impossible to overlook as the finesse with which the film glides from March 2020 to the preceding decade and back again.

This comedy of errors revolves around a hapless 30-year-old named Arturo. His penchant for indiscretions is as impossible to overlook as the finesse with which the film glides from March 2020 to the preceding decade and back again.

Four friends meet on a remote estate to create a cinematic re-enactment of three iconic works that embodied the social and artistic revolution of 50 years ago.

Two young Argentines, brought together by chance, wander the streets of New York City, increasingly lost in a maze of currency exchange, translation problems, religious vocation and nocturnal flirtation.

아르헨티나의 폐쇄적 부촌에서 벌어지는 상황을 보여주는 이 작품은 가정부로 일하는 벨렌의 시선을 통해 다가간다. 벨렌은 나체 클럽을 발견하게 되고, 그 모습을 통해 중산층 가족의 위기와 부조리함이 펼쳐진다. 대부분의 배우가 영화 내내 나체로 연기해야 하는 상황이었고, 실제 나체주의자들이 함께 촬영을 하여 현실과 영화의 경계를 넘나드는 과정도 흥미롭다. 이 작품은 아르헨티나 사회에 대한 우화이기도 하다. 곳곳에 경비시설을 갖춘 부촌과 나체주의자 클럽을 교차하면서 두 그룹 간의 간극을 통해 인간 사회 군상에 대한 질문을 던진다. 중산층의 삼엄함과 나체주의자들의 자유로움은 마치 동전의 양면처럼 한 사회를 구성하는 서로의 이면이다. 그 긴장감을 통해 루카스 발렌타 리너 감독은 집단을 이루고 있는 이데올로기의 허구성과 위선을 폭로해 간다.

아르헨티나의 폐쇄적 부촌에서 벌어지는 상황을 보여주는 이 작품은 가정부로 일하는 벨렌의 시선을 통해 다가간다. 벨렌은 나체 클럽을 발견하게 되고, 그 모습을 통해 중산층 가족의 위기와 부조리함이 펼쳐진다. 대부분의 배우가 영화 내내 나체로 연기해야 하는 상황이었고, 실제 나체주의자들이 함께 촬영을 하여 현실과 영화의 경계를 넘나드는 과정도 흥미롭다. 이 작품은 아르헨티나 사회에 대한 우화이기도 하다. 곳곳에 경비시설을 갖춘 부촌과 나체주의자 클럽을 교차하면서 두 그룹 간의 간극을 통해 인간 사회 군상에 대한 질문을 던진다. 중산층의 삼엄함과 나체주의자들의 자유로움은 마치 동전의 양면처럼 한 사회를 구성하는 서로의 이면이다. 그 긴장감을 통해 루카스 발렌타 리너 감독은 집단을 이루고 있는 이데올로기의 허구성과 위선을 폭로해 간다.

Twelve year old Juana goes to a British school in the outskirts of Buenos Aires, where she fails both socially and academically. A week away from the exams that will determine her future in the institution, she is surrounded by the same routine; going to class and trying to pull her social life back together, with useless attempts in between. Juana goes through these strange days apparently feeling indifferent towards the situation.

Twelve year old Juana goes to a British school in the outskirts of Buenos Aires, where she fails both socially and academically. A week away from the exams that will determine her future in the institution, she is surrounded by the same routine; going to class and trying to pull her social life back together, with useless attempts in between. Juana goes through these strange days apparently feeling indifferent towards the situation.

In the company of housewives, professionals and a retired tennis instructor, Hernán is part of a middle-class community that is preparing for the eventual arrival of the end of the world at a holiday resort in the marshy Tigre delta.

A filmmaker meets her ex-boyfriend, who plays a role in her new film, in which the authenticity or falsity of a kiss in a gay scene is debated, with backstage included. Metacine or metagay? Gay cinema within cinema or cinema within gay cinema, variations of a daedalus of representations. "The current boyfriend" feeds on lateral humor, on the political of desire as a talk in the kitchen, on the flicker-free observation of who we are and what we pretend to be, as a nucleus that is reinterpreted with always different gestures, once as drama and another like comedy, almost without knowing which is appropriate.

A filmmaker meets her ex-boyfriend, who plays a role in her new film, in which the authenticity or falsity of a kiss in a gay scene is debated, with backstage included. Metacine or metagay? Gay cinema within cinema or cinema within gay cinema, variations of a daedalus of representations. "The current boyfriend" feeds on lateral humor, on the political of desire as a talk in the kitchen, on the flicker-free observation of who we are and what we pretend to be, as a nucleus that is reinterpreted with always different gestures, once as drama and another like comedy, almost without knowing which is appropriate.

Inside David’s lives a troubled, doubtful, neurotic young man.

Sometimes we find ourselves walking, talking or simply looking at things. That is what the protagonists of this film do. However, inside this mystery of life, we don’t know who they are or what they do. Teddy Williams builds yet again a dense and fantasmatic universe where breezes rhyme with vacancies and to the verb to be has its full double meaning. (M. V.)